Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2000 (9) TMI 109

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....(T) ]. - Two separate questions arise for our consideration in this appeal. The first relates to the utilisation by the appellant of notification 203/92 exempting from payment of customs duty subject to the fulfilment of the various conditions, most important being the performance of an export obligation. One of the conditions in the notification is that the Modvat credit should not have been avai....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ation that has been violated. But it does not follow that the Modvat credit can be denied. There is no provision in the Modvat rules disallowing credit in a situation where customs duty exemption has been availed of. We therefore find no authority whatsoever for the denial by the Commissioner. The contention of the departmental representative that this point was not taken up by the assessee before....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t the duty was not paid on them prior to their clearance we are told is that the goods were cleared under rule 57F(4) to the appellant for it to cold roll these sheets and return to their manufacturer M/s. Essar Steel Limited. Subsequently M/s. Essar Steels Limited decided that it was not commercially viable to have these coils cold rolled by the appellant. M/s. Essar Steel Limited thus paid the d....