Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2000 (5) TMI 88

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....er per : V.K. Agrawal, Member (T)]. - The issue involved in this appeal filed by M/s Swarup Fibres Industries Ltd., is whether the bar of unjust enrichment will apply in cases where the price has remained the same inspite of increase in the rate of duty. 2. Shri Ashok Sagar, ld. Advocate submitted that the appellants are engaged in the manufacture of Vulcanised Fibre Sheet which was classified ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....L.T. 77 (CEGAT). 3. Shri Ravinder Babu, ld. DR reiterated the findings of the Commissioner (Appeals) and submitted that since incidence of duty has been passed on to their customers the refund will not be admissible to them as the bar of unjust enrichment will apply. 4. We have carefully considered the submissions of both the sides. We fully agree with ld. Advocate that as no change has take....