2001 (12) TMI 96

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....st Order-in-Appeal No. 21 to 22/2001-TRY(D) (PNV), dated 30-1-2001 passed by the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), Trichinapalli. 2. Briefly stated the Asstt. Commissioner refrained from demanding Central Excise duty of Rs. 1,82,663/- in respect of 5 AR4 clearances of goods for export under bond on account of non submission of proof of exports. He, however, imposed penalty of Rs. 250/- under R....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....petent to take action if bond has been executed with the Maritime Commissioner. 4. Govt. has gone through the written and oral submissions. It is observed that while the exports relate to 1992, 93 and 94 Show Cause Notice for demanding Central Excise duty and for imposition of penalty was issued vide O.C.N. 2855/95, dated 18-12-95 by the Range Superintendent. Perusal of the photocopies of the r....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....lternatively if time was running out, issue show cause notice answerable to the bond accepting authority and forward to that authority complete details of clearance effected for taking appropriate action in the matter at his end. However, the Asstt. Commissioner in charge of the factory of clearance for export could not take upon himself to demand duty or impose penalty under Rule 14A of the CER, ....