2009 (9) TMI 72
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....iled under Section 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 26th October, 2007 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals), Customs and Central Excise, Meerut-II filed as Annexure-4 to the writ petition. 2. It appears that a huge demand was created by the Assistant Commissioner, Central Excise, Division Hapur vide order dated 14th May, 2007. The Adjudicating Auth....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....on have already been discussed in detail. Therefore, there is no prima facie case. 3. We have heard Shri A.P. Mathur, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri S.P. Kesarwani, learned Senior Standing Counsel. 4. We have perused the impugned order and find that the Commissioner (Appeals) has not adverted to the various plea raised by the petitioner while considering the prima facie case and ....
TaxTMI