Seized foreign currency not a notified item under Section 123; burden on Revenue to prove illicit origin, confiscation set aside

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....CESTAT allowed the appeal, holding that the seized foreign currency is not a notified item under Section 123 of the Customs Act and therefore the onus lies upon the Revenue to prove that the currency was not obtained from authorized sources. The Tribunal found no evidence of smuggling, recognized the appellant's legitimate means of income (former academic and subsequent US employment), and concluded that absolute confiscation and penal measures were not warranted. The AIU officer was held to lack jurisdiction to investigate the foreign currency matter. Consequently, confiscation and penalty were set aside and the seized currency must be returned absent affirmative proof by the Revenue to the contrary.....