2014 (8) TMI 1262

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the leasehold plot bearing No. 33, Facility Centre, Kalindi Kunj Road, Jasola, New Delhi. b) To set aside and quash all the acts and omissions of the Respondent No. 2 with respect to the alleged mortgage of the plot leading to the aforesaid auction thereof and its consequences. c) To restore the status of the plot as it existed on 1st October, 2001 and 28th January, 2005 i.e. when the Plot bearing No. 33, Facility Centre, Kalindi Kunj Road, Jasola, New Delhi was allotted to Respondent No. 1 and the lease thereof was registered and executed, respectively. d) Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper may also be granted in favour of the petitioner." 2. The said authori....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....b. We have no objection in granting NOC for applying loan to Corporation Bank for making the payment to Delhi Development Authority on account of premium of land subject to the condition that mortgage permission will be issued only after executed/registration of lease-deed." 5. Thereafter, by letter dated 22nd March, 2002, Corporation Bank- respondent No. 1 herein wrote to the petitioner-Authority and informed them as under: "Referring to the above, we are to inform you M/s Sarita Vihar Club has availed a term loan of Rs. 60,00,000/- from our Bank for purchase of land allotted by you and for construction Club Building on said Land. In term of NOC provided by you under your letter No. F 13 (2) 97-IL/737/dt. 22/2/20....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ed that at best the petitioner-Authority would be entitled to rely upon the terms and conditions of the lease. Recording the statement of the respondent No. 1- bank to the said effect, the Court did not set aside the e-auction notice which had already been issued earlier on 27th September, 2012 and would have been available before the Division Bench when they passed the order on 5th November, 2012. As noticed above, the Supreme Court has dismissed the SLP filed by the petitioner-Authority vide order dated 25th October, 2013. 11. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner-Authority submits that he has a grievance that the order dated 5th November, 2012 has not been complied with and the claim of the petitioner-Authority under ....