Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2024 (2) TMI 1580

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... impugned order vide ITBA/REV/F/REV7/2021-22/1040507909(1), dated: 09.03.2022 issued by the Learned First Respondent under Section 264 for AY 2017-8 enclosed as Annexure-A. B. Quash as far as the petitioner is concerned by an appropriate writ or order in the nature of Certiorari or otherwise the impugned assessment order under Section 144 dated: 21.10.2019 vide ITBA/AST/S/144/2019- 20/1099634333(1) passed By the Learned Second Respondent for AY 2017-18 enclosed as Annexure-B. C. Quash as far as the petitioner is concerned by an appropriate writ or order in the nature of Certiorari or otherwise the impugned Demand Notice vide ITBA/AST/S/56/2019-20/1019163509(1) dated: 2.10.2019 for the payment of tax so assessed by the Lear....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Learned Second Respondent. H. Grant such other reliefs as this Honourable High Court may think fit including the cost of this writ petition. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents and perused the material on record. 3. In addition to reiterating the various contentions urged in the petition and referring to the material on record, learned counsel for the petitioner invited my attention to the impugned order at Annexure-A dated 09.03.2022 passed under Section 264 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short 'the I.T.Act') in order to contend that despite the petitioner placing sufficient material before the 1st respondent - revisionall authority as regards his explanation in not appearin....