2025 (8) TMI 1696

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r the Petitioner: Mr. S.D. Padiyar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Gaurish Agni and Mr. Prayash Shirodkar, Advocates. For the Respondent: Mr. Nikhil Pai with Mr. Narsimha Vernekar, Advocates. ORAL JUDGMENT: 1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. 2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith with the consent of the parties. 3. These five petitions arise from five execution applications respec....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t. It is these five orders that are impugned in these petitions. 5. During the pendency of these petitions, the Respondent submitted that it had applied to the Gujarat Authority for Advance Ruling on Good and Services Tax as to whether GST was at all due on the amounts claimed in the aforesaid five applications in their execution proceedings. A copy of the application filed before the said Auth....