Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

Decision allows first-time challenge to intimation under section 143(1)(a); remands to CIT(A) for factual probe

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ITAT held that legal question whether an intimation under section 143(1)(a) complied with the first proviso is admissible even if raised first before the Tribunal; revenue objections were rejected. The Tribunal found determination of a current-year long-term capital loss via such intimation goes beyond permissible adjustments under section 143(1)(a) and remitted the matter to CIT(A) for factual verification. CIT(A) must examine the assessment record to ascertain whether the intimation was issued in compliance with the first proviso and, in the absence of requisite ITR and supporting documents, determine whether the loss qualifies for carry-forward. If records establish non-compliance or entitlement to carry-forward, CIT(A) shall decide afresh and grant appropriate relief.....