Penalty upheld under Section 112(b) for smuggling over 11 kg gold; appeal dismissed for lack of valid defense

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....The CESTAT upheld the imposition of penalty under Section 112(b) of the Customs Act, 1962, against the appellant for smuggling 11,233.370 grams of foreign-origin gold. The tribunal rejected the appellant's claim of denial of opportunity for cross-examination and voluntariness of his statement under Section 108, deeming these contentions as afterthoughts unsupported by prior complaints. The recovery of smuggled gold from the appellant's possession was undisputed, with no claimant asserting ownership. The appellant's knowledge of the illicit nature of the consignment was established through his own statement and corroborative evidence. Considering the appellant's habitual involvement in smuggling and the substantial value of the confiscated g.........