Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

CESTAT denies customs duty exemption under Notification 12/2012-CE for imported goods failing factory use requirements

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....CESTAT dismissed appellant's claim for exemption benefit under Notification 12/2012-CE (S.No. 332A) for additional customs duty on imported goods. The tribunal held that exemption notifications must be strictly interpreted per Supreme Court precedent in Commissioner of Customs v. Dilip Kumar & Company, with doubts resolved favoring revenue. Appellant failed to satisfy condition requiring goods be used within factory of manufacture or fulfill alternative procedural requirements under condition 2. While rectification applications cannot re-adjudicate substantive issues, tribunal found final order's failure to address S.No. 332A claim constituted mistake apparent on record. Application disposed by substituting relevant paragraph in final order, confirming exemption unavailable to appellant for imported goods not meeting notification conditions.....