2025 (6) TMI 940

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ised the following grounds of appeal: "Ground No.1: On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the NFAC has grossly erred in upholding disallowance of expenses amounting to Rs. 86,97,237/- of business u/s 43B of the I. T. Act. The expenditure of Rs. 86,97,237/- is duly reflected in Form 3CD. Therefore, the appellant prays that the addition may kindly be deleted Ground No.2 On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the NFAC has grossly erred in upholding disallowance of interest of Rs. 3,09,701/- u/s 23 of MSMED Act. The said expenditure has already bean disallowed by appellant in the return of income under "any other disallowance' u/s 37 of 1.T Act and accordingly the appellant prays that t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 1,05,02,544/-. Out of this amount the assessee paid Rs. 86,97,237/- during the relevant previous year and the same was claimed as deduction u/s. 43B of the Act, the remaining balance on account of unpaid commission of Rs. 73,57,604/- was paid during the previous year before the filing of its return. However, the auditors inadvertently mentioned in Form 3 CD, bonus payment of Rs. 86,97,237/- under clause (b) of section 43B instead of clause (c). Subsequently, auditor's certificate regarding the inadvertent error was also filed before Ld. CIT(A) stating that the deduction is to be allowed on actual payment basis. Ld. CIT(A) while accepting the assessee's submissions regarding unpaid commission of Rs. 73,57,604/-, directed the Ld. AO to verif....