2025 (6) TMI 581
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....jay G. Talhar Advocate For the Respondent No.3 : Mr. Parikshit Dawalkar AGP For Respondents No.4 to 6 : Mr. S. K. Tambe ORDER PER COURT:- 1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties on the alternate remedy against the impugned order. 2. The petitioner was served with consolidated notice by respondent No.3 for paying GST from the year 2017 - 2021. After show-cause, the petitioner....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....as taken us through the various pronouncements of the Court and amendment to Section 9 of the GST Act. In nut shell, he submits that the issue whether Extra Neutral Alcohol (ENA) is liable for GST has been set at rest in the case of State of U.P. and others vs. M/s. Lalta Prasad Vaish and sons, 2024 INSC 812. In this case, the dispute raised by the petitioner has been elaborately discussed. 5. ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....on the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner on the issue of jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 7. Since we are prima facie satisfied with the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner, there shall be interim stay to the impugned order till the next date. 8. Issue notice to the respondents, returnable on 14.02.2025. 9. Mr....
TaxTMI