Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2025 (6) TMI 427

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... ( TECHNICAL ) Shri Vibhor Garg, C. A for the Appellant Shri Yashpal Singh, Authorized Representative for the Respondent ORDER S. S. GARG : The present appeal is directed against the impugned order dated 30.01.2014 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals), Central Excise, Chandigarh, whereby the learned Commissioner (Appeals) has partly allowed the appeal of the appellant. 2. Brief f....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....recovery of total central excise duty of Rs.1,07,55,973/- under Section 11A alongwith interest under Section 11 AB and penalty of Rs. 1,07,55.973/- under Rule 25 of Central Excise Rules 2002 (hereinafter referred to as the "CER, 2002") read with Section 11 AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (hereinafter referred to as the "CEA, 1944). After following the due process, the adjudicating authority has....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....see by the Larger Bench of the Tribunal in the case of M/s Ricela Health Foods Ltd. Vs. CCE, Chandigarh, Allahbad vide Interim Order No. 8- 11/2018 dated 30.01.2018; the Larger Bench after considering the earlier decision on the issue has held that the assessee is eligible for exemption under the Notification No. 89/1995-CE dated 18.05.1995 which exempts "waste, parings and scrap arising in the co....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n the case of M/s Ricela Health Foods Ltd cited (Supra), the Larger Bench of its interim order dated 30.01.2018 decided the matter in favour of the assessee and held that gum, wax and fatty acid are waste and the assessee is eligible for exemption under Notification No. 89/1995-CE. Further, we find that the CESTAT, Chandigarh in the case of Dhillon Oil and Fats Pvt. Ltd. cited (Supra) has held in ....