1995 (10) TMI 48

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... been filed against impugned order dated 22-5-1991 (Annexure 5 to the writ petition). We have heard Sri Sudhir Chandra and Sri Dilip Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner. None appears for the respondents, although the case was taken up in the revised list. However, we have perused the writ petition and counter affidavit. The petitioner is a U.P. Government undertaking and is engaged in the ma....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d 22-8-1991 the reason for rejecting the balance amount is that the petitioner has not produced any evidence or literature of study to show the extent to which the loss can be due to natural causes or [unavoidable] accidents. No doubt, in this very order the respondent-Government of India has held that it is not un-reasonable to believe that some loss occurs in the normal course during transportat....