TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2025 (6) TMI 190
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....hri Rajeev Agarwal, Advocate for the Appellant Shri S. K. Dikshit, Authorized Representative for the Respondent ORDER ORDER : [ PER SHRI ASHOK JINDAL ] The appellant is in appeal against the impugned order. 2. The facts of the case are that the appellant was engaged in providing consulting engineers' services. On verification of the appellant's records pertaining to the Financial Y....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ices pertaining to the CENVAT Credit availed by them, but they had argued that the extended period of limitation is not invocable against them as the facts were disclosed and available with the Department by way of periodical Returns submitted by the appellant. 3.2. During adjudication, the appellant contended that they had reversed Rs.26,94,123/-, along with interest, and there were some calcula....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e decision of this Tribunal in the case of Vandana Global Ltd. v Commissioner (Appeals) Central GST, Central Excise & Customs, Raipur (Final Order No. 51135 of 2022) in Excise Appeal No. 53026 of 2018. 7. The Ld. Counsel for the appellant further submits that in their own case, vide Final Order No. 75920/2024 dated 16.05.2024, in appeal no. ST/79353/2018 in respect of the demand pertaining to Ser....