2025 (5) TMI 1926
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....R, MEMBER ( JUDICIAL ) And HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEV TANDON, MEMBER ( TECHNICAL ) Mr.Sanjay Bhaumik & Mr.Saunya Kejriwal, both Advocates for the Appellant Mr.Sameer Chittkara & Mr.Subrata Debnath, Authorized Representative for the Revenue ORDER Per : R. MURALIDHAR : The appellant is in appeal against the impugned order challenging rejection of the refund claim filed by the appellant. 2....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e said order of rejection of refund claims, the appellant filed an appeal before the Ld.Commissioner (Appeals), who also rejected their refund claims. 2.3 Being aggrieved with the said order, the appellant is before us. 3. The ld.Counsel for the appellant submits that at the time of filing of the shipping bills by the appellant, the Adjudicating Authority passed an order of demanding export ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....gned order. 5. Heard both the parties and considered the submissions. 6. In this case, we find that it is a fact on record that the appellant filed shipping bills at the time of export of goods and duty was to be paid on the basis of DMT instead of WMT. The Adjudicating Authority without assigning any reason, demanded duty on the basis of WMT in terms of Section 17 (4) of the Customs Act, 19....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....icer may, without prejudice to any other action which may be taken under this Act, re-assess the duty leviable on such goods. 17 (5) Where any re-assessment done under sub-section (4) is contrary to the self-assessment done by the importer or exporter [ * * * ] and in cases other than those where the importer or exporter, as the case may be, confirms his acceptance of the said re-assessme....
TaxTMI