2022 (8) TMI 1576
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... CIT-DR ORDER PER N.K. BILLAIYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:- This appeal by the assessee is preferred against the order of the of the CIT(A) - 34, New Delhi dated 28.02.2017 pertaining to 2. The sum and substance of the grievance of the assessee is that the ld. CIT(A) erred in confirming the addition on account of commission which was never received by the assessee and further erred in not con....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
..../s Laxmi Remote [India] Pvt Ltd. The Assessing Officer found that the assessee has shown only Rs. 20,12,260/- as total commission and, therefore, issued show cause notice to the assessee to show cause as to why difference of commission amounting to Rs. 28,43,801/- should not be added back to the income of the assessee. 6. In her reply, the assessee stated that during the year under consideratio....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... 9. The assessee challenged the addition before the ld. CIT(A) but without any success. 10. Before us, the ld. counsel for the assessee reiterated what has been stated before the lower authorities and drew our attention to the financial statement of M/s Laxmi Remote India Pvt Ltd, the payer company and pointed out that total commission paid by the company was Rs. 11,08,708/- and vehemently sta....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ideration to the orders of the authorities below. The undisputed fact is that as per Form 26AS, the assessee has been shown as recipient of commission amounting to Rs. 48,56,061/- It is also an undisputed fact that the assessee has shown only Rs. 20,12,260/-. It is also true that the assessee has taken full credit of TDS deducted by the payer on the commission shown in Form 26AS. 14. Though the....
TaxTMI