2025 (5) TMI 295

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....te (Mob. 9810371417). For the Respondents Through: Mr. Aakarsh Srivastava, Senior Standing Counsel (Mob. 9871094948). ORDER PER 1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. 2. The present writ petition has been filed by the Petitioner under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging, inter alia, the impugned order dated 05th February, 2025 passed by the Additio....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....enefit of ITC. On the basis of the said allegations, tax demand to the tune of Rs. 2.8 crores and penalty of equivalent amount has been imposed upon the Petitioner. 4. It is submitted by Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, ld. Counsel appearing for the Petitioner that the Petitioner Company had sent a detailed reply which has not been considered by the Adjudicating Authority. In addition, the personal hearing n....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....gaon and thereafter in CGST North. In fact, the matter was being considered by the Adjudicating Authority in the CGST West to whom the proper reply has not been sent by the Petitioner. 7. In so far as the delivery of personal hearing notice is concerned, a perusal of the hearing notices and the dispatch dates, would show that the same was dispatched after the hearing was held by the Adjudicator....