TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2025 (5) TMI 146
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....run Chanana, Advocates. For the Respondents Through: Mr. Akash Panwar, Advocate for R-1, 3 & 4. Mr. Ruchesh Sinha, Advocate for R-2. PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J. (ORAL) 1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. CM APPL. 24371/2025 (for exemption) 2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 5349/2025 & CMAPPL. 24370/2025 3. The Petitioner Fe....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....l Nagar, Central Delhi and (iii) LSC DDA Market, Shop No. 68, 71, 72, D-Block, Prashant Vihar, New Delhi. 6. It is submitted by Ms. Ananya Kapoor, ld. Counsel for the Petitioner that out of these three addresses, the current address of the Petitioner is the Karol Bagh address. However, it is stated that the Petitioner had filed a form for changing details of one its Directors, which was uploa....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ubsequent letters of the Department. However, unfortunately, the confusion which has been caused qua the addresses has ensured that the personal hearing notices have not been served upon the Petitioner. 9. Mr. Akash Panwar, ld. Counsel for the Department has pointed out that the form which was filed to upload the correct details of the Director of the Petitioner itself gave the East Patel Nagar a....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....nted to the Petitioner Federation. Only one opportunity is being granted in the unique facts of this case. The limitation in respect of passing of the order pursuant to the SCN, shall not apply in the facts of this case as well. 13. The Petitioner is directed to get all its details corrected on the GST portal within 15 days failing which the Department would not be blamed for future notices being....