Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1991 (10) TMI 49

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....udge made the writ petition absolute and directed the respondents to the writ petition to pay to the petitioners interest on the amount of the refund ordered by him at the rate of 12 per cent per annum from 1st November, 1978 till the date of payment. The respondents are in appeal and Mr. R.V. Desai, their counsel, has, fairly, restricted his argument to the aspect of the interest that the learned....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....8. The application was rejected as barred by time. The appeal preferred therefrom was also rejected. The writ petition was filed on 8th April, 1982 and came to be decided on 24th March, 1988. The learned Judge ordered the refund and directed that interest should be paid on the amount thereof at the rate of 12 per cent per annum from 1st November, 1978 till the date of payment. 3. Mr. Desai, learn....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n ordered from 1st November, 1978 which was, approximately, the date upon which the refund application was made. 4. The refund application was made two years after the date of the last payment of the excise duty. It was clearly time-barred. The petitioners could secure a refund only by reason of the powers of this Court under Article 226. In the facts of the case, therefore, we are of the view th....