Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2025 (4) TMI 1191

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....KRISHNA KUMAR FOR THE PETITIONER : BY SRI. PRAKASH D., ADVOCATE FOR THE RESPONDENTS : BY SRI. ARAVIND V. CHAVAN, ADVOCATE ORDER 1. In this writ petition, petitioner has sought for the following reliefs : " A). Issue writ of mandamus directing the Respondent No.1 to consider the payment made at Annexure - 'G3' as proof of payment under section 127(5) of Finance Act, 2019 read with R....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 (for short, 'SVLDR Scheme') petitioner submitted an application on 20.12.2019 (Annexure-G) seeking benefit under the said SVLDR Scheme, thereby declaring / admitting service tax to an extent of Rs.22,79,574.50/-. On 20.01.2020, respondent No.1 / Designated Committee issued SVLDRS-Form 3 to the petitioner estimating amount payable as Rs.22,79,574.50....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....cate that the petitioner had already paid an amount of Rs.22,79,574.50/- as estimated / quantified amount in terms of the SVLDR scheme, the petitioner has not been issued with SVLDRS - Form 4 and as such, the petitioner is before this Court by way of the present petition, seeking a direction to respondent No.1 to consider the representations of the petitioner dated 30.06.2020 and 29.09.2020 as per....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ner on 19.02.2020 itself and there was no service tax liability due by the petitioner at the time of issuance of SVLDRSForm 3 by the respondents. 7. Perusal of the material on record would indicate that the amount payable by the petitioner under the SVLDR Scheme was paid by him under a different head in a manual form as a result of which same was not reckoned towards the scheme despite the petiti....