2018 (7) TMI 2368
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....preet Singh, Sr. Standing Counsel. For the Respondent : Mr. Kunal Kapoor, Adv. ORDER 1. In these appeals, the Revenue‟s grievance is that the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (hereafter "CESTAT") remanded the issues for reconsideration by the concerned Commissioner in view of the previous judgment of this Court in Mangli Impex Limited v. Union of India 2016 (335) E....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... the said order that the respondent-Revenue had no objection if the remand order passed by the Tribunal was set aside with a request to the Tribunal to decide the issue on merit without taking into consideration the decision of the Delhi High Court in Mangli lmpex Limited Vs. Union of India 2016 (335) ELT 605 (Del.) which has been stayed by the Supreme Court. 4. For the reasons set out an....
TaxTMI