Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

1991 (1) TMI 143

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Superintendent (Central Excise & Customs) Range Jodhpur dated 17-9-1984 (Anx. 2) and the remarks of the Superintendent (Central Excise & Customs) on the classification list Anx. 2A may be quashed and it is prayed that petitioner may be permitted to clear his goods. 2. The petitioner is a private limited Company and deals with the purchase of vegetable and non-essential oils (UNE) from various cru....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e further called upon him to file the fresh classification list showing the appropriate tariff rate of duty. Aggrieved against this order, petitioner has approached this Court by filing the present writ petition. 3. Mr. Lodha learned Counsel for the respondents submitted that in the similar situation, the Division Bench at Jaipur has remanded the matter back to the Collector, Central Excise and C....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r of Central Excise v.Jayant Oil Mills Pvt. Ltd. and Central Excise v. Karan Spinning Mills. Empire Industries Ltd. v. Union of India [1985 (3) SCC 314] has been referred by the Supreme Court in M/s. Ujagar Prints and others v. Union of India and others - (1989) 3 SCC 488, counsel for the excise urged that the law laid down in Empire Industries Limited case (supra) should decide the rights of the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ordance with law within a period of 10 days, thereafter. 6. The next question is regarding the amount which has already been adjudicated. Mr. Lodha submits that the amount of the duty adjudicated has not been paid by the petitioner and that comes to Rs. 40,47,477.75P. (Rupees forty lacs forty-seven thousand four hundred seventy seven and P. seventy five only). Mr. Mehta, Learned Counsel submits t....