2025 (4) TMI 809
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ehta and Adv. Jas Sanghavi i/b. PDS Legal,. For the Respondent Nos. 1 to 4: Adv. Subir Kumar with Adv. Niyanta Trivedi,. For the Respondent Nos. 5- State: Ms. Jyoti Chavan, Addl.G. P. with Adv. Manish Upadhye, AGP,. P. C. 1. The above Writ Petition is filed seeking a declaration that the development rights under a revenue sharing arrangement are not a "supply" of services, leivable to ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....on behalf of the Petitioner as well as the learned Advocate appearing on behalf of Respondent Nos. 1 to 4, we find that the arguable questions are raised in the above Writ Petition. Hence, we issue RULE. 4. As far as interim reliefs are concerned, we find that the issue in the present case is similar, though not identical, to the issue that was raised before the Gujarat High Court wherein the G....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....terms of prayer clause (d) which reads thus:- "(d):- that pending the hearing and final disposal of this petition, this Hon'ble Court be pleased to direct the Respondents by themselves, their officers, subordinates, servants and agents by an interim order and injunction from acting upon or taking any further steps or proceedings in pursuance of and/or in furtherance Order-in-Original No. ....
TaxTMI