2025 (4) TMI 707
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....or the Petitioner Through: Ms. Sangita Bhayana, Adv, (M:9810026768) For the Respondents Through: Mr. Satish Aggarwala, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr Gagan Vaswani, Adv. for DRI. PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J. (ORAL) 1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. 2. The present petition has been filed by the Petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash the Seizur....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e following findings have been rendered by the Supreme Court: "168.In view of the aforesaid discussion, we conclude that: [...] (vi) Subject to the observations made in this judgment, the officers of Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, Commissionerates of Customs (Preventive), Directorate General of Central Excise Intelligence and Commissionerates of Central Excise and other sim....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Where the writ petitions have been disposed of by the respective High Court and appeals have been preferred against such orders which are pending before this Court, they shall be disposed of in accordance with this decision and the show cause notices impugned therein shall be restored for adjudication by the proper officer under Section 28. c. Where the orders-in-original passed by the ad....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... respective High Court on the ground of maintainability due to lack of jurisdiction of the proper officer to issue show cause notices, this Court or the respective High Court shall dispose of such appeals or writ petitions in accordance with the ruling in this judgment and restore such notices to the CESTAT for hearing the matter on merits. f. Where appeals against the orders-in-original ....
TaxTMI