Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

1987 (7) TMI 114

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... without proper import licence. Hence there were adjudication proceedings and an order was passed on 17th September, 1981, whereby the said sets were confiscated under Section 111 of the Customs Act (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") read with Section 3 of the Imports and Exports (Control) Act, 1947. However, an option was given to the petitioners to pay in lieu of such confiscation a fine of ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....f fine. If at all the Customs authorities wanted to have the order revived, they should have done so after proceedings under Section 129(d) of the Customs Act. Mr. M.R. Sathe for the petitioners drew my attention to the case of Dina Baldev v. Collector of Customs, reported in 63 Bombay Law Reporter (Page 873). It clearly lays down the proposition that such an action would be a nullity and can be s....