2014 (9) TMI 1296

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... For the Respondent : Mr. M.R. Sharma, Advocate ORDER AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. 1. This appeal has been preferred by the revenue under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short, "the Act") against the order dated 27.11.2007, Annexure A. 2 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench 'B' (in short, "the Tribunal") in ITA No. 1227/Chandi/1996 for the block period 1.....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....er section 158BC read with section 158BD of the Act on 13.9.1996 calling upon the assessee to furnish a return of income for the block period 1.4.1985 to 17.7.1995. The Assessing officer thereafter determined the undisclosed income of the assessee for the block period at Rs. 1,39,96,007/- vide assessment order dated 28.10.1996, Annexure A.1. Aggrieved by the order, the assessee filed appeal before....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... under section 132(1) of the Act. Hence the instant appeal by the revenue. 4. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 5. Learned counsel for the appellant-revenue submitted that the judgment of the Tribunal is contrary to the decision of this Court in Commissioner of Income Tax, Faridabad vs. M/s Om Parkash and Sons, ITA No. 147 of 2010 decided on 14.2.2011. It was ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....eedings are completed under section 158BC of the Act of the searched person." On the aforesaid premises, it was submitted that the matter be remanded to the Tribunal with a direction to decide the same afresh in the light of observations made in the aforesaid pronouncements. 6. Learned counsel for the respondent could not seriously dispute that the matter requires to be adjudicated in the light ....