2024 (2) TMI 1519

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the order of suspension was passed on 24.02.2023, by the DoP Rajasthan. Learned counsel averred that as back as on 23.08.2023, the petitioner filed a representation before the respondents for the revocation of suspension and reinstatement in service with all consequential benefits. The said representation was quite detailed, incorporating within its body the grievance of the petitioner as well as the arguments/explanations put forth in connection therewith. However, no heed was paid to the said representation by the respondents and as a result, the petitioner is compelled to file the instant petition. 3. In addition to the aforesaid, it was argued that it has become a regular practi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ponder in delegating the dispute to the said alternate authority, better equipped with experts or otherwise, to entertain the dispute. Resultantly, in service matters, the primary expert and/or the body possessing the complete acumen regarding the issue is the State itself, being one of the parties to the litigation before the Court. 8. Therefore, by assiduously addressing the grievance put forth by the aggrieved employees and acting as first responders, the State can very well do itself a favour and reduce the litigation before it substantially. It goes without saying that the State is patently/obviously not under the responsibility to address the representations positively in favour of the aggrieved-employees. Rather, the only requiremen....