Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2023 (9) TMI 1673

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r>Dated:- 23-9-2023<br>Writ Petition No. 21171 of 2023 (T-IT) - -<br>Income Tax<br>Hon&#39;ble Mr. Justice B M Shyam Prasad For the Petitioner : Sri. Annamalai S., Advocate. For the Respondents Sri. M. Dilip., advocate. ORDER The petitioner's primary grievance is with the second respondent's order dated 31.03.2022 under Section 148A[d] of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [for short, 'the IT Act'] [Ann....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s filed such reply with the documents on 30.03.2022. The second respondent has concluded the proceedings under Section 148A[d] of the IT Act by the impugned order dated 31.03.2022 recording as follows: "The assessee was required to furnish reply on or before 23.03.2022. In response to notice, no reply has been furnished by the assessee till date. Thus, it is logical to conclude that the assessee....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....proceedings observing that no reply is filed until the date of the order, which is factually incorrect. 4. If the provisions of Section 148A of the IT Act do not stipulate that the reply must be filed within the time allowed in the notice under Section 148A[b] of the IT Act but the response is filed before the date of order under Section 148A (C), the second respondent should have been considered....