Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

1979 (12) TMI 66

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....records of the case. 2. The petitioners were granted personal hearing on 28-7-1978 and 22-10-1979 along with their advocate but they did not avail of the above said opportunity. Government therefore decide to proceed with the case without personal hearing on the basis of the evidence available on record and on the basis of the facts which are quite clear. 3. The basic issue involved in this cas....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ollector held that 1% duty under Tariff Item 68 read with Notification No. 119/75 is leviable on the product so made. The Appellate Collector confirmed the Asstt. Collector's decision. The petitioners contend that photo engraving of copper rollers received from the customers did not result in a new product and the process involved were not incidental or ancillary to the completion of a manufacture....