2025 (1) TMI 1350

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....AY BHAMORE, JM : This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 29.06.2024 passed by Ld. CIT(A)/NFAC for the assessment year 2013-14. 2. When the appeal was called for hearing, neither anybody appeared on behalf of the appellant-assessee nor any adjournment application was filed despite due service of notice of hearing. Therefore, we proceed to dispose of this appeal a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....7 of the IT Act and determined the total income at Rs. 2,52,98,620/-. The above assessed income includes addition u/s 69A of Rs. 2,52,98,620/- as unexplained money deposited in bank account. 4. Ld. CIT(A)/NFAC dismissed the appeal without admitting the same on the ground that the assessee had not satisfied the conditions of payment of advance tax as specified u/s 249(4)(b) of the IT Act. It is ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....dmit the appeal of the assessee in such an event. In the instant case, it is the claim of the assessee that since the assessee remained absent the assessment order was passed ex-parte & whatever deductions were legally available to the assessee were not allowed by the Assessing Officer. It is the contention of the assessee that being cooperative society the business income of the assessee was subj....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nal in the case of Dilip Hiralal Chaudhari vs. ITO in ITA No.642/PUN/2024 order dated 05.06.2024 and in the case of Vishnusharan Chandravanshi vs. ITO in ITA No.73/RPR/2024 order dated 10.04.2024 and also from the judgement passed by Hon'ble Karnataka High Court in the case of Govidappa Setty vs. ITO, 232 ITR 892 (Karnataka) wherein under similar circumstances the appeal of the assessee was allowe....