TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2025 (1) TMI 1301
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....of accused for rejecting the prayer of complainant seeking remand of accused and enlarge the accused on the terms and conditions as fixed by the Court. Copy supplied. Reply not filed. 3. Arguments heard. The learned counsel for the applicant/accused has submitted that the present offence is punishable under Section 132(1) of CGST Act, 2017, for which sentence is 5 years. It is further argued that grounds of arrest were not communicated properly to the accused and just formality has been made by the complainant in the name of informing the grounds of arrest and as such, the grounds of arrest as provided by the prosecution is not sufficient to understand the nature of case. It is further argued that compliance of Section 41A of Cr.P.C./Secti....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....est in writing. This Court has gone through the grounds of arrest, which were conveyed by the prosecution to the accused. It is pertinent to mention here that on arrest memo, it has been acknowledged by the accused himself in writing that he has been informed and explained about the grounds of arrest. Therefore, this Court is of the view of that ground of arrest have been properly informed and explained to the applicant/accused by the prosecution. 7. On the other hand, Shri Pramod Bahuguna, Sr. Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of complainant department has submitted that accused has been arrested as per Section 69 of the CGST Act. It is further argued that accused has been arrested under a special Act and hence, provision of Section 4....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....of Bihar decided on 02.07.2014 in Criminal Appeal No. 1273 of 2014 made it mandatory to follow the provisions of Section 41 & 41A of Criminal Procedure Code for the offence which are punishable upto 7 years. Prosecution has taken a stand that present accused has been arrested under Section 69 of CGST Act and hence, provision of Section 41 and 41A of Criminal Procedure Code/35 of BNSS Act are not applicable in the present matter but this Court does not find force in the arguments of learned counsel for the complainant. In case law titled as Akhil Krishan Maggu and another. Vs. Deputy Director and others decided on 15.11.2019 in CWP No.24195 of 2019 (O&M), Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court held as under :- 9. The provisions of CGST Ac....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... the reference to Cr.P.C. in relation to search and seizure under Section 67 (10) of CGST Act, 2017, (2) the reference to Cr.P.C. under sub-Section (3) of Section 69 in relation to the grant of bail for a person arrested in connection to a non-cognizable and bailable offence, (3) the reference to Cr.P.C. in Section 132 (4) while making all offences under the CGST Act, 2017 except those specified in clauses (a) to (d) of Section 132 (1) of CGST Act, 2017 as cognizable and bailable and (4) the reference to Sections 193 and 228 of IPC in Section 70 (2) of the non-CGST Act, 2017. Therefore, the contention of 2017, the learned Additional Solicitor General that in view of Section 69 (3) of the CGST Act, petitioners cannot fall back upon the limit....