Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2023 (9) TMI 1661

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ing Counsel ORDER This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 3. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking direction from this Court to quash the order dated 31.03.2023 passed by the opposite party No.1/learned 1st Appellate Authority by confirming the order for demand by the opposite party No.2/....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....na, the petitioner by constituting a Partnership Firm in the name and style of M/s. Prahallad Moharana and partners with effect from 05.04.2016 was also engaged in providing Works Contract Service. After the death of Prahallad Moharana other two partners continued the business by reconstituting the partnership firm with effect from 18.07.2017 as a Super Class Contractor having PWD Contractors Regi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....T 14 and Form GST DRC 01 dated 09.07.2021 relying on WAMIS data with the allegations that the Works Contractor has failed to obtain registration and discharge the tax liability and other liabilities which is amounting to Rs. 1,23,07,455/- reflected in WAMIS. As the same was not communicated to the petitioner, the petitioner could not submit the reply to the said show cause notice. It is further co....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Firm registered in the name of M/s Prahallad Moharana. Hence, the liability fixed on the petitioner by the department is not illegal. Further, it is contended that the Registration Certificate of the dealer is not valid after death of the proprietor as reported. However, the legal heir has received the payment of Rs. 1,23,07,455.00 which has not been disclosed by the petitioner in the newly allo....