Just a moment...

⚠✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Keyword Search :
AI Tools : New
Ask tax questions in natural language. Powered by AI trained on the TaxTMI legal database. Use AI Tools ➞
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS
PrevPreviousNextNext

Reassessment quashed due to discrepancy between reasons in 148A notices.

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ITAT quashed reassessment proceedings initiated u/s 148 against assessee. There was a difference between reasons communicated in notice u/s 148A(b) alleging bogus transactions of Rs. 50 lakh and subsequent order u/s 148A(d) making addition of Rs. 9.68 crore for purchases from non-filers. ITAT held initiation of proceedings itself was flawed as issues in 148A(b) notice were not carried into 148A(d) order. Following Banyan Real Estate Fund Mauritius, ITAT allowed assessee's appeal quashing reassessment notices and order.....

PrevPreviousNextNext