TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
1998 (1) TMI 70
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....here be noticed that the accounting year of the respondent-company is the calendar year. The resolution which was passed on December 6, 1962, therefore, was in the previous year relevant to the assessment year 1963-64 whereby the payment was made to the shareholders in the following year relevant to the assessment year 1964-65. In determining the amount of tax which was payable by the company for the assessment year 1964-65, the Income-tax Officer came to the conclusion that the rebate which was available to the company under the Finance Act, 1964, had to be reduced to the extent of the interim dividend paid to its shareholders in January, 1963. The claim of the respondent, in the appeal filed by it, was that the board of directors had dec....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... contended by learned counsel for the appellant that the High Court erred in coming to the conclusion that there was any declaration of any dividend as under stood under the Companies Act, by the company. According to learned counsel, the resolution of the board of directors dated December 6, 1962, cannot be regarded as a declaration of dividend by the company and, therefore, what was relevant is to see the date when the interim dividend was distributed and as the distribution took place in the previous year relevant to the assessment year 1964-65, therefore, the rebate to that extent was rightly withdrawn. On behalf of the respondent, however, it was submitted that the judgment of the High Court called for no interference as the distributi....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... of the aforesaid provision, it appears to us that the rebate given by the first proviso can be reduced if dividend has been declared or distributed by the company to its shareholders. Two expressions are used, namely, "declared" and "distributed". Learned counsel for the respondent is right in construing Explanation 3 to mean that if the declaration of the dividend is in the year prior to the commencement of the relevant previous year, but the distribution is in the relevant previous year, then no rebate would be reduced in the previous year in which distribution takes place. In other words, the rebate, as far as Explanation 3 is concerned, can be reduced only if the declaration and the distribution is in the same previous year. In our op....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....by the company in general meeting, vis-a-vis, the one exercised by the board of directors while deciding to pay an interim dividend, that in sub-clause (c) of the second proviso to paragraph D of Part II of the First Schedule to the Finance Act, the expression used is "declared or distributed to its shareholders". This clearly postulates a situation where there may be distribution of dividend without its declaration. This can be where the board of directors, and not the company in general meeting, decides to pay interim dividend, in which case the rebate will be withdrawn in the year of distribution of the interim dividend, there being no declaration by the company for the payment thereof. The difference between the nature of interim divid....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....idend is usually vested by the articles of association in the directors. For paying interim dividend a resolution of the company is not required, if the directors are authorised by the articles of association they may pay such amount as they think proper, having regard to their estimate of the profits made by the company. Interim dividend is therefore paid pursuant to the resolution of the directors on some day between the ordinary general meetings of the company. On payment, undoubtedly interim dividend becomes the property of the shareholder. But a mere resolution of the directors resolving to pay a certain amount as interim dividend does not create a debt enforceable against the company, for it is always open to the directors to rescind ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....rusted to the directors, makes no real difference in the true character of the right arising in favour of the members of the company on the execution of the power. The directors, by the articles of association, are entrusted with the administration of the affairs of a company ; it is open to them if so authorised to declare interim dividend. They may, but are not bound to, pay interim dividend even if the finances of the company justify such payment. Even if the directors have resolved to pay interim dividend, they may before payment rescind the resolution." The aforesaid observation clearly supports the view which we have taken, namely, that the nature of the interim dividend is such, that it gives no right to the shareholders to receive ....