Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1969 (4) TMI 29

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....This case arises from the judgment and order of the High Court of Calcutta dated August 27, 1963, in Income-tax Reference No. 66 of 1954. The case has been certified to this court under section 66A(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1922. The assessee-company is a dealer in shares. The company maintains its books on the cost basis and values the opening and closing stock at cost. The account year (financ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....h the face value of bonus shares Loss to P & L a/c Rs. 41,600 received free of cost (100) shares @ Rs. 100 each Rs. 10,000 ------------------- ------------------- Rs. 71,200 Rs. 71,200 ------------------- ------------------- The Income-tax Officer valued the shares as follows: Dr. Sold Cr. C.S. 100 sh. old 19-1-49 100 sh. old Rs. 19,600 Rs. 61,200 C.S. 100 sh. Bonus Rs. 30,60....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t the face value of these shares, namely, Rs. 10,000 ?" The High Court, following its own decision in Income-tax Reference No. 54 of 1950 decided on the same day, held in favour of the assessee. According to the High Court the bonus shares had to be taken to have cost according to their face value. The present appeal is filed against the decision of the High Court as stated above. In Commissione....