2024 (12) TMI 622

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the Respondents: Mr. Siddharth Chandrashekhar a/w Ms. Sangeeta Yadav. P.C.   (PER M.S. SONAK, J.) :- 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Rule. Rule is made returnable immediately with the consent and at the request of the parties. 3. The petitioner seeks the following substantive reliefs in this petition:- "a. Rule be issued. Record and proceedings be called f....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e same is transcribed below for the convenience of reference:- "To, M/s. Shree Pooshphans Chemicals, W-186D, MIDC, Taloja, District-Raigad, Maharashtra-410208. Gentleman, Sub:- Permission of discharge of approx 15 Cbm Sludge/Oily Water from vessel M.V. LMZ Blanca-reg It is to state that "You had submitted an application for a 'No O....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ecent operations." This Issues with approval of the Deputy Commissioner, Customs, Ratnagiri Division..." 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner justifiably submits that before the impugned order/communication was made, the respondents should have issued a show cause notice and heard the petitioner. She points out that the impugned order/communication subjects the petitioner to serious c....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ion contains no reason. Merely stating that the NOC is revoked because of violation of the Customs Act, 1962 and the Rules and Regulations established thereunder does not amount to a reason but only a conclusion. From this conclusion, it is also most difficult to discern what violations were allegedly committed by the petitioner. 9. For the above reasons, we quash and set aside the impugned ord....