Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

1974 (3) TMI 15

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r was a partner. The said assessment was also for the aforesaid assessment year 1961-62. Thereafter, the Income-tax Officer, "A " Ward, Dist. III(3), Calcutta, gave to the petitioner on the 6th May, 1966, a notice under section 154/155 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The purpose of this notice was to rectify the petitioner's assessment made on the 14th March, 1962, upon the assessment of the petitioner's firm on the 31st March, 1966. It has to be borne in mind that the Income-tax Act, 1961, came into effect from 1st of April, 1962. On the 12th May, 1966, respondent No. 1, that is to say, the Income-tax Officer concerned passed an order against the petitioner under section 154 of the new Act for the assessment year 1961-62, rectifying the asses....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....(2)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and in view of the fact that the return of the income of the petitioner in his individual capacity had been filed prior to 1st of April, 1962, and the assessment was made before 1st of April, 1962, the learned judge came to the conclusion that the notice was not properly issued under section 154 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The learned judge relied on the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of S. Sankappa v. Income-tax Officer. We are in agreement with the aforesaid conclusion of the learned judge. Indeed, not much argument was advanced before us in respect of this and no cross-objection has been filed by the respondent challenging the aforesaid finding of the learned judge. The learned judge, how....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 1922, which are as follows : " Where in respect of any completed assessment of a partner in a firm it is found on the assessment or reassessment of the firm or on any reduction or enhancement made in the income of the firm under section 31, section 33, section 33A, section 33B, section 66 or section 66A that the share of the partner in the profit or loss of the firm has not been included in the assessment of the partner or, if included, is not correct, the inclusion of the share in the assessment or the correction thereof, as the case may be, shall be deemed to be a rectification of the mistake apparent from the record within the meaning of the section, and the provisions of sub-section (1) shall apply thereto accordingly..." The learn....