TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2024 (12) TMI 554
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....eal in all these cases are identical and are reproduced as under:- "1. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC). Delhi u/s 250 of the Act is bad both in the eye of law and on facts. 2. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT (A) (NFAC) erred in dismissing the appeal filed by the appellant on the grounds of non-submission of documents by the appellant without considering the submitted document and the facts of the case. The appellant, therefore, prays that the impugned order be set aside. 3. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, Ld. CIT (A) (NFAC) erred in ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....w, Ld. CIT (A) NFAC erred in dismissing the appeal filed by the appellant without deciding the appeal on the merits as laid down in Dinesh Kumar Chimanbhai Nandani Versus Income Tax Officer and ITO, New Delhi v. M/s. M.M. Chhabra & Sons (HUF), New Delhi. 8. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the order passed by the Ld. CIT (A) (NFAC), Delhi u/s 250 of the Act, on 08.07.2024 is bad in the eye of law as the same is issued after the time limitation period allowed by the section 250 of the Act. 9. That the impugned order passed by the Ld. CIT (A) (NFAC), is on assumptive grounds and is beyond the financial capacity of the assessee to pay." 10. That the assessee craves leave to amend, alter or add to the groun....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e the search of the Departmental data base did not reveal that the assessee had filed any return prior to the investments, the ld. AO had reason to believe that there was income escaping assessment to the extent of investments made by the assessee. Accordingly, in both assessment years, the ld. AO issued notices under section 148. There was no compliance to the notices under section 148. Therefore, the ld. AO issued notices under section 142(1) on three occasions. Upon the failure to receive any compliance, a show cause notice under section 144 was issued to the assessee and upon failure to receive compliance to the same, orders were passed under section 147 r.w.s. 144 and section 144B of the Income Tax Act on 20.03.2022 in the A.Y. 2013-14....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....on various dates during the year and from the same he concluded that the assessee was continuously residing in India during the year. In view of the above, he rejected all the grounds of appeal taken by the appellant and the additions made by the ld. AO were upheld. 4. The assessee is aggrieved at this dismissal of his appeal by the ld. CIT(A), NFAC and has accordingly come before us. Shri. Adiya Chhajed, Advocate (hereinafter referred to as the 'ld. AR') appeared on behalf of the assessee and argued the case. It was submitted that the assessee was working in Saudi Arabia from 1997 till 2018. During the years under consideration, the assessee did not come to India, however since the family of the assessee reside in India, he used to remi....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....filed a written submission with regard to the notices issued. However, the ld. CIT(A), NFAC had not bothered to go through the documents that had been uploaded along with the replies and had simply stated that evidences had not been filed by the assessee. It was submitted that since the order had been passed without taking material evidences available on record, the impugned orders were in violation of the principles of natural justice and therefore, void. In support of this argument, our attention was invited to the following decisions:- i. ACIT vs. Balmiki Prasad Singh, 2018 (9) TMI 1936 - SC. ii. Nabco Products Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India & Others Writ Tax No.997 of 2022 (Allahabad) dated 3.08.2022. iii. Emco ....