Tribunal Rules Extended Limitation Period Inapplicable Due to Lack of Fraud or Intent to Evade Tax in Duty Dispute.

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws →

Tribunal Rules Extended Limitation Period Inapplicable Due to Lack of Fraud or Intent to Evade Tax in Duty Dispute.

X X X X Extracts X X X X

....The Tribunal held that the extended period of limitation of five years under proviso to Section 73(1) of the Finance Act could not have been invoked in the present case. The Tribunal observed that for invoking the extended period, at least one of the five elements of fraud, collusion, wilful mis-statement, suppression of facts or contravention with intent to evade payment of service tax must be established. Mere difference of opinion between the department and the assessee regarding leviability of duty does not amount to wilful suppression of facts. In the present case, the show cause notice was issued beyond the normal period of one year, without invoking the proviso. The facts were already in the knowledge of the department through public.........

Contact Us At :

FAQs :

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Tribunal Rules Extended Limitation Period Inapplicable Due to Lack of Fraud or Intent to Evade Tax in Duty Dispute.