2017 (11) TMI 2065

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Shri S.N. Gohil, AR, for the Respondent. ORDER The appellant is in appeal against the impugned order wherein the refund claim has been rejected as time-barred. 2. The facts of the case are that, for the period October, 2010 to February, 2011, the appellant being merchant exporter filed application for refunds under Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 before the Commissioner of Central ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... in terms of Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Aggrieved from the said order, the appellant is before me. 3. Heard the parties. The above narrated facts are not in dispute that for the period October, 2010 to February, 2011 the refund claims filed before the Central Excise and Customs, Rajkot on 3-5-2011. At the time of filing refund claim the receiving officer was duty bound not to ....