Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1974 (9) TMI 16

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....itioner was a partner in a firm of partnership called Messrs. Pattu Padmanabha Chetti and Sons. The partnership firm was assessed to income-tax for the assessment years 1964-65 and 1965-66 and income-tax to the tune of Rs. 3,43,195 was due from the partnership firm. The firm was an unregistered partnership and there is no dispute that the petitioner was a partner. This writ petition has been filed....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....partnership firm is not enough for proceeding against the garnishee. In fact, in Sahu Rajeshwar Nath v. Income-tax Officer, the Supreme Court considered a similar question and held that where an unregistered firm is assessed to income-tax and a notice of demand is issued against that firm, it is not necessary to serve a separate notice of demand under section 29 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922,....