Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1974 (12) TMI 17

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that the interest of Rs. 10,774 and Rs. 9,521 credited to the accounts of (1) K. K. Anandaiah and Sons family and K. N. Krishnamurthy & Sons family, respectively, cannot be disallowed under section 40(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ? " The assessee is a registered firm consisting of three partners and it carried on wholesale business in cloth. Among the three partners, the first two named in the deed, viz., K. N. Anandaiah and K. N. Krishnamurthy, are kartas of their respective Hindu undivided families. They were partners of the firm on behalf of their respective families. In the accounting year of the firm ending on March 31, 1966, there was only one account each in the n....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....missioner of Income-tax v. T. Veeraiah and K. Narasimhulu [1977] 106 ITR 283 (AP), to contend that the amounts paid by the farm as interest on the amount due to a Hindu joint family which is represented by its karta in the firm is a payment of interest to the partner of the firm within the meaning of section 40(b) of the Act, and hence not deductible in computing the profits and gains of the firm's business. Mr. Dasaratharama Reddy, the learned counsel appearing for the assessee, contended that that decision is distinguishable on facts, and that the amounts paid by way of interest is not to the individual partners but to the Hindu joint families of which they were members. What amounts are not deductible are stated in section 40. S....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of profit is first credited to the individual accounts of K. N. Anandaiah and K. N. Krishna murthy. From the individual accounts of these two partners the shares of profit are further transferred to the accounts of their respective joint Hindu families." It would, therefore, appear that what was first credited to the accounts in the names of K. N. Anandaiah and K. N. Krishnamurthy were later transferred to the accounts of their respective Hindu undivided families. There is also the further fact that not only the interest credited to their individual accounts was transferred to the accounts of the respective Hindu undivided families, but also the profits of the firm first credited to their individual accounts were also transferred to the ....