Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

Non monetary consideration

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....on monetary consideration<br> Query (Issue) Started By: - Anish Sonak Dated:- 25-10-2024 Last Reply Date:- 28-10-2024 Goods and Services Tax - GST<br>Got 7 Replies<br>GST<br>Hi, Loss was incurred by one of customers say Y due to delay in supply of machine by X (the supplier). Y intended to claim damages of 30 Cr. Instead of paying in cash, X supplies two machines on lease free of charge to Y fo....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r a period of 2.5 yrs. Would it be said the supply of machines by X is for a consideration. Is there any kind of non monetary consideration Y has provided to X. Whether X should pay GST on notional value of lease rentals. I believe Y would not have any complication in light of circular on liquidated damages. Regards. Reply By Sadanand Bulbule: The Reply: Dear Sir Plz refer CBIC Circular No.1....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....78/10/2022 dated 03/08/2022 read with Section 2 [31][b] governing the issue of &quot;Liquidated Damages&quot;. Reply By Shilpi Jain: The Reply: Yes. there is a supply of service by X in return for non-monetary consideration. GST will have to be paid on the market value of such rentals by X Rightly mentioned regarding no liability in hands of Y. Reply By Anish Sonak: The Reply: Since Y accept....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ed free supply as full and final settlement it incidates they have not tolderated the act of delay by X. Forbearance to sue is not helping X because Y have recovered the damages out of court itself. The free supply as a settlement was for the underlying loss and not for forbearance. What else can be called to be non monetary consideration. Reply By Sadanand Bulbule: The Reply: Shilpi mam Pl....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....z refer your article dated 23/06/2020 on the issue of write off and reversal of ITC thereon. Can you enlarge the position? Reply By VENU K: The Reply: Circular 178/10/2022 says 7.1.4 In this background a reasonable view that can be taken with regard to taxability of liquidated damages is that where the amount paid as 'liquidated damages' is an amount paid only to compensate for injury, loss or ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....damage suffered by the aggrieved party due to breach of the contract and there is no agreement, express or implied, by the aggrieved party receiving the liquidated damages, to refrain from or tolerate an act or to do anything for the party paying the liquidated damages, in such cases liquidated damages are mere a flow of money from the party who causes breach of the contract to the party who suffe....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rs loss or damage due to such breach. Such payments do not constitute consideration for a supply and are not taxable. Now when liquidated damages are paid in the form of a service as per the mutual consent of parties does the equation change to make this a supply ? I dont think so. So in my humble opinion there cannot be a supply that makes anything liable to taxation. Reply By Sadanand Bulbule....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....: The Reply: Dear querist &quot;As long as you are on the side of law, you are on the side of the angels. You can&#39;t lose&quot;. You are safe. Reply By KASTURI SETHI: The Reply: Sh.Sonak Ji, You have got compensation. It is not disputed. Cannot be denied but this activity/transaction is not-taxable on the following grounds :- (i) Compensation is not income. Hence no consideration is pre....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sent. (ii) The activity/transaction does not fall under the scope and meaning of the phrase, &#39;tolerating an act&#39; but it falls under the phrase , &#39;not tolerating an act&#39;. Hence cannot be treated as supply as per Section 7 of CGST Act read with the above circular. (iii) Also not covered under Clause No.5 (2) (e) of Schedule-II. Out of scope. (iv) In view of above (i) (ii) & (ii....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....i) no GST is leviable. (v) My reply is in consonance with the replies of Sh. Sadanand Bulbule, Sir. Dive deep in his replies in this scenario.<br> Discussion Forum - Knowledge Sharing ....