Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1976 (12) TMI 52

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....lore Bench, under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, has referred the following questions for the opinion of this court; " (1) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, it has been rightly held that the proceedings under section 154 were rightly invoked ? (2) If the answer to the first question is ' yes ', whether it could be held that, in the facts and circumstanc....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... calculating the interest the Income-tax Officer had treated the assessee as a registered firm. On October 27, 1967, a, partner of the assessee appeared before the Income-tax Officer pursuant to the notice issued by him and stated that the assessee had no objection to the revision proposed by the Income-tax Officer. Thereafter, the Income-tax Officer passed an order on February 17, 1968, rectifyin....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... fact that one of the partners of the assessee, viz., Shri Chandulal Kamdar, appeared before the Income-tax Officer on October 27, 1967, and stated that the assessee had no objection to the proposed revision. Once the assessee had stated that it had no objection to the proposed revision and the Income-tax Officer had also revised the original assessment as proposed by him, the assessee could not b....