Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2024 (10) TMI 796

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., VAT & Sales Tax<br>Honourable Dr. Justice Anita Sumanth And The Honourable Mr. Justice G. Arul Murugan For the Petitioner : Mr. S. Kaarthick for Mr. K. Soundararajan For the Respondents : Mr. G. Nanmaran Special Government Pleader ORDER DR.ANITA SUMANTH., J. The petitioner is a registered dealer under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 (in short &#39;Act&#39;). In respect ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....on. 3. An appeal was filed by the petitioner before the first appellate authority who, upon consideration of the submissions made, allowed the appeal in full by order dated 14.11.2002. 4. Assailing this, the revenue filed an appeal before the Tamil Nadu Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal (&#39;STAT&#39;/&#39;Tribunal&#39;). The Tribunal reversed the order of the first appellate authority allowing ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....losing Stock (II) 5,39,000/- &nbsp; 5,97,937/- ("105) Sales (II) 6,37,369/- Gross Profit (7%) 39,432/- The first appellate authority had accepted this paper unconditionally. 6. The Tribunal, in our view, rightly, found fault with the admission of the additional evidence merely for the asking. The purported trading account had not been found by the authorities, or produce....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....evious period. This argument of the petitioner is rejected and the conclusion of the Tribunal in this regard is confirmed. 8. However, we are of the considered view that two equal time additions towards purchase suppression is unwarranted. The business premises of the petitioner has been subjected to inspection and the authorities had full access to the documents and books of accounts. They wer....