Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2024 (10) TMI 504

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....R ( JUDICIAL ) Shri C S Vinod , Assistant Commissioner ( AR ) for the appellant Shri Mayur Shroff , Advocate for the respondent ORDER PER : C J MATHEW This appeal has been preferred by the jurisdictional Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune - IV seeking repudiation of the order of the first appellate authority in directing finalization of provisional assessment of M/s Dhariwal Industries Ltd ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... on the submission that the value of clearance was not determinable, had sought 'provisional assessment' which was permitted vide order dated 6th March 2013. It is on record that goods were cleared at value of Rs. 15,000/kg from 1st April 2012 to 9th September 20012 and from 10th September 2012 onwards at Rs. 14,500/kg which was found to be appropriate in terms of section 4 of Central Excise Act, ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Goods) Rules, 2000 without establishing flow back of money and that there was evidence upon to suggest mutuality of interests between two separate legal entities. 4. We have heard Learned Authorised Representative for the appellant-Commissioner and Learned Counsel for the respondent. 5. The appellant-Commissioner seeks restoration of the order of the original authority while urging us to set asi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e 8 of Central Excise Valuation (Determination of Price of Excisable Goods) Rules, 2000 and with the circular of Central Board of Excise & Customs (CBEC) supra. This was on a clear finding that transactions with unrelated persons did not exist for application in clearances to related person. It is seen from the order of the original authority that, despite having been furnished with costs sheet ne....