2024 (10) TMI 57

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... For the Petitioners : Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Sr. Advocate, with Mr. Diwan Singh Negi, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Rajinder Thakur, Central Government Counsel, for respondent No. 1. Mr. Vijay Kumar Arora, Advocate, for respondents No. 2 and 3. RAJIV SHAKDHER, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) The following substantive prayers have been made by the petitioners :- "a). That a Writ in the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....service tax payable for the period in question from the year 2012- 2013 to June, 2017. d) That a writ in the nature of mandamus may kindly be issued to the effect that in the event of any additional ESTE amount being found payable on account of the default of respondents, respondent No. 4 may be directed to pay this amount towards full and final settlement. e) That a declaration ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ept that a suit action for claiming damages can be instituted. 3.2 We had put to Mr. Kuthiala on the previous date that he should obtain instructions whether or not the petitioners would like to take recourse to an alternate remedy concerning respondent No. 4. 3.3 Besides this, as noticed above, even against respondents No. 1 to 3 an alternate remedy by way of a statutory appeal is available....