Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2024 (9) TMI 470

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Company had imported raw material used for manufacture of drugs and pharmaceutical without clearance from the Assistant Drug Controller (ADC) and without proper import license. The consignments imported by M/s Antoni & Decourel Organic Chemical were cleared through different clearing agents including the Appellant. They have cleared 33 consignments through Air Cargo Complex, Chennai during December, 2012 to April 2013. 30(thirty) Bills of entry were filed by Customs Broker M/s Ever Trust Shipping and Logistics Pvt., Ltd., and 3(three) Bills of entry were filed by the Appellant herein. Though the Adjudicating authority held that the Appellant is not directly involved in the act of their authorized signatory at Chennai, it is held that the Ap....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ervices Pvt Ltd vs CC, Hyderabad (2019 (368) E.L.T 41 (Telangana), maintained by Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in 2022 (381) E.L.T 436 (SC)). 4. Regarding alleged violation of Regulation 17(9) of CBLR, 2013, the Learned Counsel submits that there is neither an allegation regarding violation of Regulation 17(9) of CBLR, nor any action for the said violation was proposed in the Show Cause notice or Inquiry report. The finding of the Commissioner with respect to the violation of Regulation 17(9) is totally unsustainable. The Appellant cannot be held responsible for the omission on the part of the employees. The Learned Counsel relied on the following judgments/decisions, where it is held that for the employee's mis conduct, the CB shall not ....